The system used by personal injury lawyers provides any potential client with the chance to control the amount of money that a retained personal injury lawyer in Windsor receives for his or her efforts.
Any possible client has the chance to enjoy a free consultation with a considered attorney. Smart would-be clients plan ahead for participation in such a meeting. Each of them assembles a list of questions for the consulted member of the legal community.
During discussion of the lawyer’s contingency fee, the potential client ought to ask about what percent of any commission or court-ordered judgment the consulted attorney would plan to take. By the same token, the consulted lawyer ought to be asked about when that contingency fee will be taken from the client’s reward. If the lawyer were to take the fee before calculating costs, then the lawyer would receive a larger amount of money, and the client would get less.
Naturally, a lawyer’s contingency fee would cease to exist, if a client’s defendant had failed to purchase insurance, and the client had failed to invest in the uninsured motorist option. Still, the unfortunate potential client could use the free consultation as a time for seeking advice. The consulted attorney might be able to suggest the ideal approach for someone that has become the victim of an accident involving an uninsured motorist.
The client’s right to set limits
While the client must allow the lawyer to use some of the reward money, in order to cover the expenses, clients do have a right to put a limit on the expenses. Then if their lawyer were to exceed that limit, the same clients could pay for only those expenses that fell within the agreed upon limit.
Some accident victims want to put a limit on a lawyer’s fee even before the consultation. Some victims simply choose to handle the case on their own, without a lawyer’s guidance. That is a foolish way to establish any type of limit. It deprives the potential client of any useful information.
Certain situations get resolved more easily, with the help of a lawyer. For instance, any claimant might find that the defendant’s insurance company has alleged shared fault on the part of the plaintiff/claimant. An attorney’s experience would help him or her to demand proof that some of the fault had come from the attorney’s client.
If the other insurance company could not provide such proof, then that could serve as a reason for fighting the company’s allegations. In other words, the lawyer could help the client to save a fair amount of money. Why limit the fee for someone that has learned how to save clients’ money?